On the evening of Sept. 28, 2000, former Indiana state trooper David Camm came home to find his 35-year-old wife Kim and his five-year-old daughter Jill murdered, both shot execution-style in the head; his seven-year old-son Brad died after being shot in the chest. Just three days later, Camm, 36, was arrested and charged with the murders. Camm has adamantly denied any involvement in the murders. Correspondent Richard Schlesinger has spent years investigating the case, one with bizarre evidence and many unusual twists that would lead to an ending that no one expected. Earn Money For Free For Shopping On eBay & Over 340 Retailers! www.bigcrumbs.com Shop at stores.ebay.com
25 Responses to “48 Hours Mystery – Murder On Lockhart Road (Part 4 of 10)”
Leave a Reply
RSS Feeds-
Advertisment
-
he prolly left the sweat shirt to throw the cops off..he could have picked up the nasty sweater from a church gym.
Camm Walks 12/01/09 Indiana court ruling today
NOPE he is going back to trial and he’ll be found Guilty again
Cheater, liar, and killer. . .
Give him a lie detector test!!
Word is he has taken 3 of them and failed them ALL.
What city in indiana would be the next trial city for camm, maybe Gary, Hammond, East Chicago, you pick the city…………
Let the people of Indiana pick the city, you think?
I live in NE Indiana and saw on WANE Ft. Wayne news channel last week the trial may be moved up here.
wtf is the motive here?
dude is INNOCENT
HE DIDNT DO IT
Oh YES he did 2 Juries said so, and so will the 3rd.
family member alert…..
vassilis01
To be single again and be able to date who ever he wants.
That’s the motive for divorce, not for murder.
To most people that would be the case but to some it’s a motive to murder.
Well, yeah, everything can be a motive for murder to SOMEONE lol…but there should be a better motive given to explain a man shooting not just his wife but also killing his children, including shooting his little girl in the head! “Wanting to date” seems like an incredibly weak motive for prosecutors to give without anything of value to back it up.
It does seem weak but what do you think the jury heard that made them find him guilty?
The child molestation aspect gave them more of a motive, even though it was not proven or shown that David actually did it. But let’s face it, if you find out a murdered child had also been the victim of molestation, you figure that the person doing the molesting also committed the murders. If the prosecution did a good enough job of speculating that it was David who did the molesting, then there ya go. God forbid, though, if the coroner made a mistake and there really WAS no molestation.
That sweatshirt could have been planted there.
@mosaicglass
why killing his children, then?
you can be single and have children
anyway as the first trial showed , the fact that he was married never deter him from cheating on his wives
@guiademsandrine
I don’t know. It’s frustrating that there is no definitive proof either way.
he became large
Before i started playing Part 4 on part 2 when they first mentioned the sexual assault i was wondering why the fuck they were going to let the jury hear that in the murder trial when for one it wasn’t proven HE did molest the little girl jill it would have made him look exactly like the prosecutors wanted like a demon but now seeing this one i’m glad because it should have NEVER been known to the jury with out PROOF he was the molester of the little girl. Glad he’s getting a second chance.
This guy was a cop for years!! He could have got that shirt from a previous arrest, it’s easy to put a print on some thing…very easy!! Please remember, he was a cop, he knows everything about evidence.